For the People by the People.
Secrecy is a privilege extended to the government by the people and it can be rescinded. The Declaration of Independence expresses the right and duty of the people to keep its government in line.
Those who are supposed to uphold the founding documents of the United States via their government positions but act in contrast to such, are acting in a manner termed "treason."
The Exposure of such acts of treason are not to be considered illegal but rather are to be considered within the rights and duty of Americans in following the foundation documentation of the United States. To uphold the ideals of the Founding Fathers.
As Wikileaks is not just an exposure of the US government but of other countries governments and associated businesses, the seemingly apparent bias towards the US is in proportion to the destructive military weapons bias in consideration to the worlds sum total of such destructive forces.
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Big TOE of Thomas Campbell
An interesting Theory of Everything....
Here are 18 youtube segments on a talk Thomas Campbell did on his big TOE.
Here are 18 youtube segments on a talk Thomas Campbell did on his big TOE.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Backwards to see the Future
I've seen Colin Andrews' UNESCOs video mentioning a Crop Circle showing a 2033 date with earth missing and I've seen Crop Circles Connectors interpretation of that CC which is different and the same CC I suggested a possible intentional, rather than natural, breakup of a comet or asteroid a short time later.
2033... I do not know that I have enough information, but I have some information in mind, widely available. We have doubled the population since the 70's. At this rate of population growth and life extension technology, we'll probably double it again by then to about 14.4 billion and regardless of any "natural disasters".
I do not believe we are given any advanced technology but rather only given such information that gets us to put together in new or certain ways what we have developed and understand, to build upon what we have done, recursively. I think it was once tried, to give us advanced technology, but we failed to understand and instead wrongly abused it. We perceived god(s), instead of fellow conscious being, so they left from our daily lives so to give us a fair chance to evolve.
What advanced technology we may have obtained (not given) I seriously expect those who have it are dumbfounded by it and hide it to hide their ignorance and in accord with their waring mindset fear. There are at least two things that we have a very old but detailed enough description of to build. The Arch of the Covenant and the Spaceship of Ezekiel. Yet we still lack the know how to build the Arch safely. Maryland Institute of Technology back in the 70's canceled such a project as it began to put off high levels of static electricity that became dangerous for the students building it. And the Spaceship, we can build everything except for the power source which is believed to be nuclear.
Two points:
1) Population growth brings about a need for change.
Its happened before as noted with the metaphor of the tower of babel story. A transition that happened around the world as different and disconnected populations grew and each population experienced the transition at their reaching a given population level, causing a need to refine resolution levels of their languages. Julian Jaynes work really does well in exploring this transition. The down side is that the transition to using higher level abstraction opened the door to introspection and wrongful deceptive use of abstraction, while at the same time disconnecting us from acute awareness of nature with the distraction of abstraction.
2) Advancement in knowledge and technology are something we are going to have to do ourselves because we have proven how good we are at getting things given to us wrong, and being abusive with it. This is who we are at this state of being. And it too is something that can be calculated and expected of in our evolution from a more advanced and experienced enough POV. Though it may be questionable if they were then experienced enough to know not to try giving us their tech. Such an attempt may have been influential to why we have had corrupted hierarchies.
I do not believe we are the first species to have evolved to higher levels of intelligent conscious being, nor will we be the last, as our species may well participate in the creation and influence in the next species to evolve. What is more important than the survival of any given species is the survival of conscious beings that pursue the survival instinct of causing expansion of the universe and development of life forms to help this expansion, recursively. You can have a house, but if not maintained, it will deteriorate by natures hand. And where different species have different enough perceptions that contribute to the growing sum strength of understanding and application of knowledge. Just as we have seen with cross breading animals and combining nationalities and cultures of ourselves brings strength to the whole.
What's going to happen between 2012 and 2033?
Setting aside cosmological events for which we have no control over but can only hope those beings who can influence such will continue to do so .... as would be helpful to our evolution. Maybe we need some disasters to take away that which has become to distracting to us and detouring our evolution? Probably.
21 years is a short time to make a transition.
Looking at this from a more advanced POV:
If I were a member of an advanced race, species or community with the objective of creating additional conscious life that will contribute to the survival of conscious beings and the expansion of the universe, would I not also be able to know, along with the clock of cosmology, at what point success or failure would be determined for the development of a new species? Or would this be more a "some will become what we want and others will not but perish" while we have even cross genetically engineered still others?
From a human species point of view (blind to more advanced POVs)
Population growth is going to force us into a need to change. Perceived natural disasters that remove distractions can help. Having less and less time to use higher level abstraction for dishonesty we will streamline our use of abstractions for increasingly honest communications, as a matter of survival. However, we will also find limits in pure abstraction and find the solution is in combining our ability of being in tune with nature, which we had set aside for abstraction use, with honest use of abstraction. A new mindset emerges. Fully in touch with nature but of higher level abstract intelligence. Something our species has never had before.
Once we were non-conscious but as all animals, acutely in tune with nature, without introspection created guilt, living in the garden of eden you might say. Then we became conscious with the use of higher level abstractions, in order to better deal with growing population problems. As this transition evolved and we became less and less in touch with nature we tried to stay in touch with nature via oracles but that faded as our abstractions grew in use and complexity. Now we again have reached a population problem and war options for reduction is fading fast, due technology enhanced communications teaching us there are only people living their daily life like everyone else, except for the few who cause problems with all with their deceptions, which are now becoming exposed for all to see.
I think you can see where I believe things are headed and why. And that my reasoning is without the need to mention some aspects or personal essence summary POV's such as alien or spirituality topics.
On one hand I think the analogies and metaphors of summaries can be to easily misinterpreted by others (missing the beauty of the tree details due the forest overview.) On the other hand, to much detail focus can be distracting and cause missing the point of the big picture (not seeing the forest for the tree leaf.) And then there is what actually happens in the forest in the full scope of the smallest to the largest view. But how to communicate enough of the details and the big picture combined in terms acceptable to the large majority?
Why is the earth not in that 1995 CC?
As a tree in the forest of CC's, it seems to say the earth is not going to be here and given the CC Connector interpretation, it'll be a cosmological event, an asteroid or comet that completely destroys the existence of the planet. But from the CC forest POV, we have seen errors in enough CC's and there has been a general theme of pending disaster that may never happen but to only motivate us to evolve. Or perhaps that's the deciding factor event as to whether or not success or failure of the whole of this species called human, is determined. But one that we make in whether or not we get it together well enough and fast enough with our own knowledge and technology to alter the course of a much larger than earth colliding body. There is a point where a parent must kick their child out on there own because the parent simply can't deal with the situation any longer.
How I came to realize the need for transition:
------------------------------------------------------
The need for a transition at this point in time came to my awareness not by CC's or cosmology or alien related matters or even spiritually. It came to my attention because I tried to do something so obvious and simple in concept that certainly I'd be able to easily do it. Instead I found resistance, a massive and unbelievable degree of resistance. Certainly the idea of conspiracy crossed my mind and I explored that direction, but realized the evolving population mindset width and scope is beyond conspiracy though the seed of this mindset may have been influenced dishonestly. Bill Gate is credited, recognized even by myself, with introducing the general population to the use of computers. He became very wealthy and said the way to success is by making others need you. This very philosophy spread as others followed. But what happened is that end users were intentionally constrained in what they could do for themselves. Give... uh err, sell a man a fish and you feed him for a day and get rich as the days go by. But teach him how to fish and he feeds himself for life and you don't get rich that way.
What happened is that we, the majority, were dumb down kept regarding the technology we use, and for the sole purpose of making some rich or less, just well employed. We were not given the simple and logical tools that most certainly should exist so that we may have used a computer with abstractions, in analogy, as fluidly as we use a calculator with the abstraction subset called numbers. The computer OS technology supporting the base of such a direction has been removed and suppressed from the mass market, regardless of excuses given (i.e. the unbelievable soap opera like history of the Amiga computer OS) And there are plenty good sounding excuses fabricated for dumb downing maintenance. "Users don't want to program" as an excuse for not providing them with generic ability to automate and edit some automation they would create and use to be more productive. "Users don't want to calculate Einstein equasions" as an excuse to not provide a generic calculator to do daily math?
Conspiracy of the connected or monetary motives of many disconnected individuals? All that matters and regardless of why or which side, is the mindset is wrong in general. And wrong about what? The use of Abstractions. Failure to understand or resistance to understanding the mechanical like nature of the use of abstractions. Perhaps perceived as a threat to individuality or spirituality, or a threat to the intentional deceivers?
But.... All Are Created Equal.... in how we process abstractions.
Hence, the need for a transition in mindset is the conclusion I came to at some point in my efforts to research and understand what the problem is and why. A conclusion I came to nothing less than 10 years ago and not more than 20 years ago. From first thought to growing certainty... and now I see a growing awareness of transition needed and believed to be going to happen, as verification even of timing related to computer technology development. What percentage of the population and rate of awareness and/or how to make the transition smooth and efficient is perhaps where the question now is.
I know computers with the end user tools we already should have had can be extremely helpful in such a transition, providing a mental mirror for people, but only if we realize the output is totally relevant and a reflection to our input of and by ourselves. It scary that some don't realize this about computers, that computer output is not images of gods but of programmers and users, who are error prone humans.
Mr. Joshua on the Circle Chasers FB page is really scary with his Bible code output. I'm not sure he realizes or even wants to realize the program he is using is just outputting the input he is inputting. He is holding up what he claims is the hidden encoded words of god, but what is in fact a stone image of his own input running through the mindset image of the programmer who wrote the $79.95 text character search and sort program. The scary part is those who believe him and his improving his input skills and where this can lead. I don't want to help him promote this illusion by giving him any more for him to input. Camel, straw, broken back.... I left the group.
There are those who say that each of us should do what we remember we are here to do, to help this transition happen. For myself, clearly its the "abstraction physics" knowledge and its computer application tool set I realized, identified, defined, programed some of,... paid another to program more of and have a little left to do to generally complete the functional base set,..... for which I could and can afford to pay someone to do..... However, and regardless of what I know is possible to do with it, (from using it to automate with current tools and methods, to building from ground up a more efficient way of programming and user created general automation), there does not seem to yet be the need/motive enough for it by others to show active interest, much less use it should it be available in functionality more so than it already is.
So I wait for and sometimes see if others are yet interested. Maybe that's my fault. Maybe I should not wait. But I also don't want to contribute to illusions of stone based superiority either. And now that I'm aware of the projected solar storms of 2012-2013 should that happen to such a degree as to damage or disable computers and networks, then maybe the time to do it right, from ground up will be afterwards.
Genuinely,
T.Rue
2033... I do not know that I have enough information, but I have some information in mind, widely available. We have doubled the population since the 70's. At this rate of population growth and life extension technology, we'll probably double it again by then to about 14.4 billion and regardless of any "natural disasters".
I do not believe we are given any advanced technology but rather only given such information that gets us to put together in new or certain ways what we have developed and understand, to build upon what we have done, recursively. I think it was once tried, to give us advanced technology, but we failed to understand and instead wrongly abused it. We perceived god(s), instead of fellow conscious being, so they left from our daily lives so to give us a fair chance to evolve.
What advanced technology we may have obtained (not given) I seriously expect those who have it are dumbfounded by it and hide it to hide their ignorance and in accord with their waring mindset fear. There are at least two things that we have a very old but detailed enough description of to build. The Arch of the Covenant and the Spaceship of Ezekiel. Yet we still lack the know how to build the Arch safely. Maryland Institute of Technology back in the 70's canceled such a project as it began to put off high levels of static electricity that became dangerous for the students building it. And the Spaceship, we can build everything except for the power source which is believed to be nuclear.
Two points:
1) Population growth brings about a need for change.
Its happened before as noted with the metaphor of the tower of babel story. A transition that happened around the world as different and disconnected populations grew and each population experienced the transition at their reaching a given population level, causing a need to refine resolution levels of their languages. Julian Jaynes work really does well in exploring this transition. The down side is that the transition to using higher level abstraction opened the door to introspection and wrongful deceptive use of abstraction, while at the same time disconnecting us from acute awareness of nature with the distraction of abstraction.
2) Advancement in knowledge and technology are something we are going to have to do ourselves because we have proven how good we are at getting things given to us wrong, and being abusive with it. This is who we are at this state of being. And it too is something that can be calculated and expected of in our evolution from a more advanced and experienced enough POV. Though it may be questionable if they were then experienced enough to know not to try giving us their tech. Such an attempt may have been influential to why we have had corrupted hierarchies.
I do not believe we are the first species to have evolved to higher levels of intelligent conscious being, nor will we be the last, as our species may well participate in the creation and influence in the next species to evolve. What is more important than the survival of any given species is the survival of conscious beings that pursue the survival instinct of causing expansion of the universe and development of life forms to help this expansion, recursively. You can have a house, but if not maintained, it will deteriorate by natures hand. And where different species have different enough perceptions that contribute to the growing sum strength of understanding and application of knowledge. Just as we have seen with cross breading animals and combining nationalities and cultures of ourselves brings strength to the whole.
What's going to happen between 2012 and 2033?
Setting aside cosmological events for which we have no control over but can only hope those beings who can influence such will continue to do so .... as would be helpful to our evolution. Maybe we need some disasters to take away that which has become to distracting to us and detouring our evolution? Probably.
21 years is a short time to make a transition.
Looking at this from a more advanced POV:
If I were a member of an advanced race, species or community with the objective of creating additional conscious life that will contribute to the survival of conscious beings and the expansion of the universe, would I not also be able to know, along with the clock of cosmology, at what point success or failure would be determined for the development of a new species? Or would this be more a "some will become what we want and others will not but perish" while we have even cross genetically engineered still others?
From a human species point of view (blind to more advanced POVs)
Population growth is going to force us into a need to change. Perceived natural disasters that remove distractions can help. Having less and less time to use higher level abstraction for dishonesty we will streamline our use of abstractions for increasingly honest communications, as a matter of survival. However, we will also find limits in pure abstraction and find the solution is in combining our ability of being in tune with nature, which we had set aside for abstraction use, with honest use of abstraction. A new mindset emerges. Fully in touch with nature but of higher level abstract intelligence. Something our species has never had before.
Once we were non-conscious but as all animals, acutely in tune with nature, without introspection created guilt, living in the garden of eden you might say. Then we became conscious with the use of higher level abstractions, in order to better deal with growing population problems. As this transition evolved and we became less and less in touch with nature we tried to stay in touch with nature via oracles but that faded as our abstractions grew in use and complexity. Now we again have reached a population problem and war options for reduction is fading fast, due technology enhanced communications teaching us there are only people living their daily life like everyone else, except for the few who cause problems with all with their deceptions, which are now becoming exposed for all to see.
I think you can see where I believe things are headed and why. And that my reasoning is without the need to mention some aspects or personal essence summary POV's such as alien or spirituality topics.
On one hand I think the analogies and metaphors of summaries can be to easily misinterpreted by others (missing the beauty of the tree details due the forest overview.) On the other hand, to much detail focus can be distracting and cause missing the point of the big picture (not seeing the forest for the tree leaf.) And then there is what actually happens in the forest in the full scope of the smallest to the largest view. But how to communicate enough of the details and the big picture combined in terms acceptable to the large majority?
Why is the earth not in that 1995 CC?
As a tree in the forest of CC's, it seems to say the earth is not going to be here and given the CC Connector interpretation, it'll be a cosmological event, an asteroid or comet that completely destroys the existence of the planet. But from the CC forest POV, we have seen errors in enough CC's and there has been a general theme of pending disaster that may never happen but to only motivate us to evolve. Or perhaps that's the deciding factor event as to whether or not success or failure of the whole of this species called human, is determined. But one that we make in whether or not we get it together well enough and fast enough with our own knowledge and technology to alter the course of a much larger than earth colliding body. There is a point where a parent must kick their child out on there own because the parent simply can't deal with the situation any longer.
How I came to realize the need for transition:
------------------------------------------------------
The need for a transition at this point in time came to my awareness not by CC's or cosmology or alien related matters or even spiritually. It came to my attention because I tried to do something so obvious and simple in concept that certainly I'd be able to easily do it. Instead I found resistance, a massive and unbelievable degree of resistance. Certainly the idea of conspiracy crossed my mind and I explored that direction, but realized the evolving population mindset width and scope is beyond conspiracy though the seed of this mindset may have been influenced dishonestly. Bill Gate is credited, recognized even by myself, with introducing the general population to the use of computers. He became very wealthy and said the way to success is by making others need you. This very philosophy spread as others followed. But what happened is that end users were intentionally constrained in what they could do for themselves. Give... uh err, sell a man a fish and you feed him for a day and get rich as the days go by. But teach him how to fish and he feeds himself for life and you don't get rich that way.
What happened is that we, the majority, were dumb down kept regarding the technology we use, and for the sole purpose of making some rich or less, just well employed. We were not given the simple and logical tools that most certainly should exist so that we may have used a computer with abstractions, in analogy, as fluidly as we use a calculator with the abstraction subset called numbers. The computer OS technology supporting the base of such a direction has been removed and suppressed from the mass market, regardless of excuses given (i.e. the unbelievable soap opera like history of the Amiga computer OS) And there are plenty good sounding excuses fabricated for dumb downing maintenance. "Users don't want to program" as an excuse for not providing them with generic ability to automate and edit some automation they would create and use to be more productive. "Users don't want to calculate Einstein equasions" as an excuse to not provide a generic calculator to do daily math?
Conspiracy of the connected or monetary motives of many disconnected individuals? All that matters and regardless of why or which side, is the mindset is wrong in general. And wrong about what? The use of Abstractions. Failure to understand or resistance to understanding the mechanical like nature of the use of abstractions. Perhaps perceived as a threat to individuality or spirituality, or a threat to the intentional deceivers?
But.... All Are Created Equal.... in how we process abstractions.
Hence, the need for a transition in mindset is the conclusion I came to at some point in my efforts to research and understand what the problem is and why. A conclusion I came to nothing less than 10 years ago and not more than 20 years ago. From first thought to growing certainty... and now I see a growing awareness of transition needed and believed to be going to happen, as verification even of timing related to computer technology development. What percentage of the population and rate of awareness and/or how to make the transition smooth and efficient is perhaps where the question now is.
I know computers with the end user tools we already should have had can be extremely helpful in such a transition, providing a mental mirror for people, but only if we realize the output is totally relevant and a reflection to our input of and by ourselves. It scary that some don't realize this about computers, that computer output is not images of gods but of programmers and users, who are error prone humans.
Mr. Joshua on the Circle Chasers FB page is really scary with his Bible code output. I'm not sure he realizes or even wants to realize the program he is using is just outputting the input he is inputting. He is holding up what he claims is the hidden encoded words of god, but what is in fact a stone image of his own input running through the mindset image of the programmer who wrote the $79.95 text character search and sort program. The scary part is those who believe him and his improving his input skills and where this can lead. I don't want to help him promote this illusion by giving him any more for him to input. Camel, straw, broken back.... I left the group.
There are those who say that each of us should do what we remember we are here to do, to help this transition happen. For myself, clearly its the "abstraction physics" knowledge and its computer application tool set I realized, identified, defined, programed some of,... paid another to program more of and have a little left to do to generally complete the functional base set,..... for which I could and can afford to pay someone to do..... However, and regardless of what I know is possible to do with it, (from using it to automate with current tools and methods, to building from ground up a more efficient way of programming and user created general automation), there does not seem to yet be the need/motive enough for it by others to show active interest, much less use it should it be available in functionality more so than it already is.
So I wait for and sometimes see if others are yet interested. Maybe that's my fault. Maybe I should not wait. But I also don't want to contribute to illusions of stone based superiority either. And now that I'm aware of the projected solar storms of 2012-2013 should that happen to such a degree as to damage or disable computers and networks, then maybe the time to do it right, from ground up will be afterwards.
Genuinely,
T.Rue
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Where to now?
I started this blog being motivated in trying to get a better understanding and handle in regards to my thoughts to reality manifestation/conversion and experiences of such. So going into fields of physics and consciousness and the connection between the two, which gets into philosophy, religion or such similar combo mindset seems to be the path taken, one thing leading to another.
Although I have taken in a lot of information its time to ask myself if any of it has been helpful to my actually better understanding & controlling the conversion/manifestation process?
Probably, I think maybe so, though I'm not yet sure. Maybe I never really will be sure. I have come to a hard realization that I've had this ability since I was a young teenager, perhaps even earlier, though I didn't realize it. Hard to accept events.
It seems possible that the physical heart plays a role, not so much in the way of the word often attached to the heart, "love", but rather as a function of the process of conversion/ manifestation. Of the think and feel parts, it the feel part and the location of "feel".
Maybe this is the on/off switch I'm looking for.
Although I have taken in a lot of information its time to ask myself if any of it has been helpful to my actually better understanding & controlling the conversion/manifestation process?
Probably, I think maybe so, though I'm not yet sure. Maybe I never really will be sure. I have come to a hard realization that I've had this ability since I was a young teenager, perhaps even earlier, though I didn't realize it. Hard to accept events.
It seems possible that the physical heart plays a role, not so much in the way of the word often attached to the heart, "love", but rather as a function of the process of conversion/ manifestation. Of the think and feel parts, it the feel part and the location of "feel".
Maybe this is the on/off switch I'm looking for.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Government disclosure
It is best to assume that the government organizations who may or not have information or proof of alien existence and technology are really just to ignorant and war mongering mindset biased to not really have anything of value.
Many people want to believe in some government conspiracy regarding UFO and alien life and technology. Though it is reasonable to think they likely have some knowledge and proof, its really quite clear that they do not have the intelligence or proper mindset to really do anything more with it than hide it for fear of others finding out how ignorant they are.
But don't we already know this?
Who is fooling who here?
There is nothing we are going to get from any intelligent life above ourselves, that we can actually properly use. We can however develop our own technology such that we actually understand it.
How I know this and am very certain of is really quite simple.
The description of "arch of the covenant" is so detailed that we can and always have been able to build it. A project to do such a thing was undertaken by Maryland Institute of Technology. The project was canceled as it began to put off such a high level of static electricity that it became dangerous for the students building it. You will not find reference to this project online, or at least I couldn't find it. It was before there was a WWW.
The point is, why look for the Arch of the Covenant and pursue all the mystery/history of it, when we have the plans to build it?
There is more to this.
If we can figure out how to convert static electricity to something more stable, then perhaps we have free energy.
There is more:
If we cannot build this in a safe manner, given all our technology of today............ what does that say about our evolution or possible alien life and technology? Are we de-evolving? Or was there more to the building of the Arch, such as alien influence and help in the construction?
This is not knowledge or technology that is being hidden, but rather information that has been spread around the world with full public access.
So why is it that I do not believe governments have any information of any usable value other than keeping it hidden to hide their ignorance, if there is anything there at all?
Many people want to believe in some government conspiracy regarding UFO and alien life and technology. Though it is reasonable to think they likely have some knowledge and proof, its really quite clear that they do not have the intelligence or proper mindset to really do anything more with it than hide it for fear of others finding out how ignorant they are.
But don't we already know this?
Who is fooling who here?
There is nothing we are going to get from any intelligent life above ourselves, that we can actually properly use. We can however develop our own technology such that we actually understand it.
How I know this and am very certain of is really quite simple.
The description of "arch of the covenant" is so detailed that we can and always have been able to build it. A project to do such a thing was undertaken by Maryland Institute of Technology. The project was canceled as it began to put off such a high level of static electricity that it became dangerous for the students building it. You will not find reference to this project online, or at least I couldn't find it. It was before there was a WWW.
The point is, why look for the Arch of the Covenant and pursue all the mystery/history of it, when we have the plans to build it?
There is more to this.
If we can figure out how to convert static electricity to something more stable, then perhaps we have free energy.
There is more:
If we cannot build this in a safe manner, given all our technology of today............ what does that say about our evolution or possible alien life and technology? Are we de-evolving? Or was there more to the building of the Arch, such as alien influence and help in the construction?
This is not knowledge or technology that is being hidden, but rather information that has been spread around the world with full public access.
So why is it that I do not believe governments have any information of any usable value other than keeping it hidden to hide their ignorance, if there is anything there at all?
Monday, September 6, 2010
Spectrum of Research in Non-Terrestrial Knowledge and Technology.
Just as in any other field of research or industry, there are those who are on the honest and true end of the spectrum and those who are on the other end, as well as all those who fall somewhere within the spectrum.
The spread of the spectrum within any given field of research or industry is often enough influenced by additional factors such as, public safety regulations, financing, law, etc..
Unfortunately, the field of research regarding the class containing alien knowledge and technology and application of, and within the public view, is biased away from the honest and true side of the spectrum. Not to say there is not honest and true research findings available to the public, but that in searching for it you will find more that doesn't fit that end of the spectrum but at best falls into the category of speculation and worse, total fabrication for personal agendas, disinformation and con for profit. And further but even more unfortunately, there are those who will feed off genuine research, distorting it as they see to fit their personal agendas. This does not help the public find clarity in drawing the line between the erroneous and honest information.
So what is one who has a genuine interest in understanding the honesty of the subject matter, to do?
Of course personal experience is where one may start, but even here it may be worth pursuing some sort of verification, if there is any question of whether a personal experience really happened of not.
Otherwise, and even in consideration of, a lack of undeniable evidence, the thing to do is to put effort into understanding the big question of why? Why are there claims of aliens encounters, abductions, knowledge, technology and even applications of, but such a great lack of proof relevant to the amount of claims?
Perhaps that is a question at the top of a pyramid, where the honest answer is far wider and deeper in scope than the question would seem to ask for.
Before going into available evidence let's touch on a few things, make a few assumptions but only to help draw a theory so to see if the evidence fits and to help us to know where to look to perhaps find such evidence.
For those who don't know or recall personally, knowledge of alien existence or related knowledge and/or technology:
1) Assume they do exist and that they have been here for quite some time.
2) Assume any conspiracy theories you may come across in the search and consideration of evidence, are of no primary value. We are not seeking to be distracted by conspiracy, but seeking evidence that helps us answer the big question of why, as indicated above.
3) Assume that any knowledge and/or technology that we don't already have due our own R&D will not be given to us by them (aliens). Assume the reason is simply because it its not in our scope of understanding and ability to make proper use of yet. We have to advance on our own.
4) Assume, regarding knowledge, that we can be inspired to put together what we have. What we already have within human knowledge can be brought to our individual attention. And any summed knowledge is within our ability to understand and properly make use of.
So where might we begin to look for evidence that leads to answering the question?
History, archeology, human evolution in social changes due population growth.
Technology, both biological and technological, and rate of advancement of these.
Cosmology, Astronomy on the large scale. Particle physics on the very small scale.
The Theory:
We have enough of our own information/knowledge to compile for an answer and not just a potentially valid answer but an obvious and certain answer with further expectations to extrapolate.
The spread of the spectrum within any given field of research or industry is often enough influenced by additional factors such as, public safety regulations, financing, law, etc..
Unfortunately, the field of research regarding the class containing alien knowledge and technology and application of, and within the public view, is biased away from the honest and true side of the spectrum. Not to say there is not honest and true research findings available to the public, but that in searching for it you will find more that doesn't fit that end of the spectrum but at best falls into the category of speculation and worse, total fabrication for personal agendas, disinformation and con for profit. And further but even more unfortunately, there are those who will feed off genuine research, distorting it as they see to fit their personal agendas. This does not help the public find clarity in drawing the line between the erroneous and honest information.
So what is one who has a genuine interest in understanding the honesty of the subject matter, to do?
Of course personal experience is where one may start, but even here it may be worth pursuing some sort of verification, if there is any question of whether a personal experience really happened of not.
Otherwise, and even in consideration of, a lack of undeniable evidence, the thing to do is to put effort into understanding the big question of why? Why are there claims of aliens encounters, abductions, knowledge, technology and even applications of, but such a great lack of proof relevant to the amount of claims?
Perhaps that is a question at the top of a pyramid, where the honest answer is far wider and deeper in scope than the question would seem to ask for.
Before going into available evidence let's touch on a few things, make a few assumptions but only to help draw a theory so to see if the evidence fits and to help us to know where to look to perhaps find such evidence.
For those who don't know or recall personally, knowledge of alien existence or related knowledge and/or technology:
1) Assume they do exist and that they have been here for quite some time.
2) Assume any conspiracy theories you may come across in the search and consideration of evidence, are of no primary value. We are not seeking to be distracted by conspiracy, but seeking evidence that helps us answer the big question of why, as indicated above.
3) Assume that any knowledge and/or technology that we don't already have due our own R&D will not be given to us by them (aliens). Assume the reason is simply because it its not in our scope of understanding and ability to make proper use of yet. We have to advance on our own.
4) Assume, regarding knowledge, that we can be inspired to put together what we have. What we already have within human knowledge can be brought to our individual attention. And any summed knowledge is within our ability to understand and properly make use of.
So where might we begin to look for evidence that leads to answering the question?
History, archeology, human evolution in social changes due population growth.
Technology, both biological and technological, and rate of advancement of these.
Cosmology, Astronomy on the large scale. Particle physics on the very small scale.
The Theory:
We have enough of our own information/knowledge to compile for an answer and not just a potentially valid answer but an obvious and certain answer with further expectations to extrapolate.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Crabwood crop circle
Regardless of what you may read elsewhere about the 2002 Crabwood crop circle (google it and read what you will)
The 60 line image of Crabwood is not relevant to the early 1950 TV resolution but to something else. If anything it was saying to look back to a short distance in history...as 60 lins of tv resolution was reminiscent of the 1930's mechanical set. By the 50's we had a lot more lines of resolution happenings. http://www.burnworld.com/dvd/primer/ntsc.htm
re: beyond mechanical TV's of the 30's having under 100 lines (wikipedia) With these systems (far more than 100 lines), the BBC began regularly scheduled black and white television broadcasts in 1936, but these were shut down again with the start of World War II in 1939. In 1941 the first NTSC meetings produced a single standard for US broadcasts. US television broadcasts began in earnest in the immediate post-war era, and by 1950 there were 6 million televisions in the United States.
in the US:
The War Production Board halted the manufacture of television and radio equipment for civilian use from April 22, 1942 to August 20, 1945, limiting any opportunity to introduce color television to the general public.
atom bombs (wikipedia)
the U.S. dropped the nuclear weapon "Little Boy" on the city of Hiroshima on Monday, August 6, 1945, followed by the detonation of "Fat Man" over Nagasaki on August 9.
WWII officially began on September 1, 1939 and ended Sept. 2 1945.
6 years. But lets go back about 10 months from this beginning date to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
Take that measure from "Crystal Night" beginning to end of WWII and simply double it. Here is where you will be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Washington_D.C._UFO_incident
The UFO fly over was a response saying to the US: NO you are not the greatest power on earth!
And that is all it was. There was no alien/us military meeting, no agreement. There was no need for one. It was enough of a statement that the US government couldn't do anything about the fly overs. And the world saw this, humbling the US in the eyes of the world. Helped to de-stress world concern over US abusing its atomic power, reducing the overall atomic arms race rate. What you don't see is what would have happened had they not done the fly over. And done at a time when we had better TV communications.
Of course the supposed leaked stories were nothing more than the US government trying not to lose any illusion the rest of the world might have about the US being all powerful. but just a snake that promises to make things better for people in countries its enters, but it only strips away what was and leaves empty the space it stripped away. And that is history.
The 60 line image of Crabwood is not relevant to the early 1950 TV resolution but to something else. If anything it was saying to look back to a short distance in history...as 60 lins of tv resolution was reminiscent of the 1930's mechanical set. By the 50's we had a lot more lines of resolution happenings. http://www.burnworld.com/dvd/primer/ntsc.htm
re: beyond mechanical TV's of the 30's having under 100 lines (wikipedia) With these systems (far more than 100 lines), the BBC began regularly scheduled black and white television broadcasts in 1936, but these were shut down again with the start of World War II in 1939. In 1941 the first NTSC meetings produced a single standard for US broadcasts. US television broadcasts began in earnest in the immediate post-war era, and by 1950 there were 6 million televisions in the United States.
in the US:
The War Production Board halted the manufacture of television and radio equipment for civilian use from April 22, 1942 to August 20, 1945, limiting any opportunity to introduce color television to the general public.
atom bombs (wikipedia)
the U.S. dropped the nuclear weapon "Little Boy" on the city of Hiroshima on Monday, August 6, 1945, followed by the detonation of "Fat Man" over Nagasaki on August 9.
WWII officially began on September 1, 1939 and ended Sept. 2 1945.
6 years. But lets go back about 10 months from this beginning date to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
Take that measure from "Crystal Night" beginning to end of WWII and simply double it. Here is where you will be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Washington_D.C._UFO_incident
The UFO fly over was a response saying to the US: NO you are not the greatest power on earth!
And that is all it was. There was no alien/us military meeting, no agreement. There was no need for one. It was enough of a statement that the US government couldn't do anything about the fly overs. And the world saw this, humbling the US in the eyes of the world. Helped to de-stress world concern over US abusing its atomic power, reducing the overall atomic arms race rate. What you don't see is what would have happened had they not done the fly over. And done at a time when we had better TV communications.
Of course the supposed leaked stories were nothing more than the US government trying not to lose any illusion the rest of the world might have about the US being all powerful. but just a snake that promises to make things better for people in countries its enters, but it only strips away what was and leaves empty the space it stripped away. And that is history.
Barbury Castle crop circle of 1991
Israel Joshua uses bible code decoding software and supposedly found the following regarding a crop circle.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36250352/Barbury-Castle-CC-Blue-Prints
The crop circle in 1991 at Barbury Castle was the one that caught my attention to crop circles, due to... well read on.
(for many people crop circle are like art, having many interpretations - some claim they represent technology that can be built and there have even been claims of a few having built such technology but who has seen what is claimed to have been built?)
Joshua, careful what the stone image of the beast tells you. For the beast to hide its exposed reflection it will claim the reflection is lessor and different than it honestly and fully is.
Your "discovered" BC matrix on this CC is just such an example.
Before I give an analogy of this CC usage there are a couple things to say. First, they who lay crops circle down (human or otherwise) will not give us anything that we already don't have. If alien then perhaps its a time paradox rule or rule of not giving technology to a life form that will abuse it. But they can bend the rules in the since they can inspire us to put together what we already have. Second, giving us technology as to how to build ships is of little value to us in that we are not decoding it well enough to be developing and producing it on the scale we need to, nor do we have the time to. They are fully capable of removing all of us and more of all the life on this planet, should the need arise. But they will not take us against our will. There are over 7 billion humans on this planet but only a very small fraction, much less than the number of those who deceive, who are even looking at, not to mention thinking about, crop circles. Having general understanding of some things is helpful, that we do not freak out.
The analogy of this CC in use. Consider a fractal, ie the Mandelbrot set. the center circle represents the core functionality, the unavoidable action constants that allow processing the Mandelbrot equation, which is this case is the next circle out. The third circle out is the user interface where you apply the three generic fractal oriented functions of setting place value, resolution and recursion. Moving inward and outward in the generated results of the equation.
Geometry size is relevant to itself. the center and second circle are within the main triangle because the core functionality and equation are set, but the third circle out, going outside the main triangle indicates user interaction.
The triangles really are not triangles, but rather just lines that represent relationships between the core functionality, the equation and the user interface via the generic set of three fractal functions. There is no harm in perceiving the triangles as a tetrahedron or even a mirrored tetrahedron if it helps one visualize zooming inward and outward. Note that a mirrored tetrahedron (it would be called something else) has six sides.
Why six divisions of resolution and six levels of recursion?
Perhaps because at that level of detail validation and or manifestation happens? Certainly we have six degrees of separation, six levels of learning, six....etc..
Now this Mandelbrot equation was just an analogy, that of course works.
Had I wrote metaphor, that would be different.
The Mandelbrot equation here represents an image of a human created mindset. The core functionality is never going to change, for it is what it must be, nothing more, nothing less. but the second circle out, that can change to represent a human mindset, perhaps habitual actions of a person. Of course that means the third circle out is external influence that sets off the various facets of the human mindset reaction.
As I said, they who put crop circle down will not give us anything we don't already have, but only inspire us to put together what we already have. And this is true here. As it was about three and a half years before this CC that I identified the core functionality or action constant set as well as a configuration of them, for full versatility. read up... Abstraction Physics
And the Mandelbrot CC that showed up later was a response to my questioning whether this Barbury Castle crop circle was a fluke or not.
This, running on stone, image that you purchased and run to "discover" BC's is just that. A mindset image created by the beast of man, just as all programs you run on your computer, are. And the beast can hide behind its running on stone image of itself. Isn't that right Israel?
Internet based communications 1990-91
6-ai-a1-txt
7-ai-b1-txt (see msg 270)
And a little later I complied something I wrote, referring to a knowledge calculator, with other text: Knowledge Calculator
(note email address in document is now invalid)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36250352/Barbury-Castle-CC-Blue-Prints
The crop circle in 1991 at Barbury Castle was the one that caught my attention to crop circles, due to... well read on.
(for many people crop circle are like art, having many interpretations - some claim they represent technology that can be built and there have even been claims of a few having built such technology but who has seen what is claimed to have been built?)
Joshua, careful what the stone image of the beast tells you. For the beast to hide its exposed reflection it will claim the reflection is lessor and different than it honestly and fully is.
Your "discovered" BC matrix on this CC is just such an example.
Before I give an analogy of this CC usage there are a couple things to say. First, they who lay crops circle down (human or otherwise) will not give us anything that we already don't have. If alien then perhaps its a time paradox rule or rule of not giving technology to a life form that will abuse it. But they can bend the rules in the since they can inspire us to put together what we already have. Second, giving us technology as to how to build ships is of little value to us in that we are not decoding it well enough to be developing and producing it on the scale we need to, nor do we have the time to. They are fully capable of removing all of us and more of all the life on this planet, should the need arise. But they will not take us against our will. There are over 7 billion humans on this planet but only a very small fraction, much less than the number of those who deceive, who are even looking at, not to mention thinking about, crop circles. Having general understanding of some things is helpful, that we do not freak out.
The analogy of this CC in use. Consider a fractal, ie the Mandelbrot set. the center circle represents the core functionality, the unavoidable action constants that allow processing the Mandelbrot equation, which is this case is the next circle out. The third circle out is the user interface where you apply the three generic fractal oriented functions of setting place value, resolution and recursion. Moving inward and outward in the generated results of the equation.
Geometry size is relevant to itself. the center and second circle are within the main triangle because the core functionality and equation are set, but the third circle out, going outside the main triangle indicates user interaction.
The triangles really are not triangles, but rather just lines that represent relationships between the core functionality, the equation and the user interface via the generic set of three fractal functions. There is no harm in perceiving the triangles as a tetrahedron or even a mirrored tetrahedron if it helps one visualize zooming inward and outward. Note that a mirrored tetrahedron (it would be called something else) has six sides.
Why six divisions of resolution and six levels of recursion?
Perhaps because at that level of detail validation and or manifestation happens? Certainly we have six degrees of separation, six levels of learning, six....etc..
Now this Mandelbrot equation was just an analogy, that of course works.
Had I wrote metaphor, that would be different.
The Mandelbrot equation here represents an image of a human created mindset. The core functionality is never going to change, for it is what it must be, nothing more, nothing less. but the second circle out, that can change to represent a human mindset, perhaps habitual actions of a person. Of course that means the third circle out is external influence that sets off the various facets of the human mindset reaction.
As I said, they who put crop circle down will not give us anything we don't already have, but only inspire us to put together what we already have. And this is true here. As it was about three and a half years before this CC that I identified the core functionality or action constant set as well as a configuration of them, for full versatility. read up... Abstraction Physics
And the Mandelbrot CC that showed up later was a response to my questioning whether this Barbury Castle crop circle was a fluke or not.
This, running on stone, image that you purchased and run to "discover" BC's is just that. A mindset image created by the beast of man, just as all programs you run on your computer, are. And the beast can hide behind its running on stone image of itself. Isn't that right Israel?
Internet based communications 1990-91
6-ai-a1-txt
7-ai-b1-txt (see msg 270)
And a little later I complied something I wrote, referring to a knowledge calculator, with other text: Knowledge Calculator
(note email address in document is now invalid)
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Our Evolution
There was a time when we lived in a non-conscious awake state as many animals do, even today. But they understand nature and know how to respond, like monarch butterflies flying north for 3 generations and then the forth generation that lives much longer takes the long trip back to Mexico. Birds that can fly south for the winter but return to the same tree in the summer trip north. Crabs that know to move inland and how far, when a storm is approaching, such a where a hurricane will hit shore.They know and there was time when we did too.
We were able to do some complex things but still limited. But our population grew and the complexity of society grew more than we were able to handle in such a non-conscious manner, so the bicameral mind of ours broke down, as recorded in the metaphor story of the tower of babel. We had to evolve to survive the growing population and complexity or society. We created consciousness, the ability to think in higher levels of abstraction, to overcome the problems.
However, it was recognized we had to give up our non-conscious tie into nature. So to help over come this loss the position of oracle was established. The job was to go into a trance like state, or revert back to a bicameral mind state to report back what nature was saying. In time this position of oracle became outdated as we developed our abstract knowledge to better deal with our environment. Yet today, we still have some who do such a thing, i.e. Edgar Cayce...
However, there is a bad side to the use of higher level abstractions, which required introspection. Deception was discovered in the use of higher level abstraction and even the first recorded suicide.
You can read up on all this by studying the works of Julian Jaynes. However, Julian's work is from a subjective POV in that its about what people experience incoming, not in what they were outputting back into the media of which nature used to communicate to them. Perhaps it didn't make enough difference then to be noticed as the knowledge was still very nature oriented even with the higher level abstractions then in use.
Today we have evolved our abstractions quite beyond nature, enough so that when the need arises again for us to take an evolutionary step, we will (and have begun to) notice how our thoughts can manifest into reality in more direct ways than through our hands on creation process.
We are not taking a step backwards, but rather we are beginning to incorporate the benefits of our non-conscious mind with our conscious mind via reintegrating our bicameral mind state. And again its due growing population and complexity of society that is driving it. But there is more which can push us to make the move sooner. Thenatural disaster of solar storms that knock out our electronics, including communication and perhaps even transportation (most vehicles today have an on board computer that will prevent the car from operating if its busted). And natural disasters may very well include the sort of events that seem to be building, flooding, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc. Or perhaps its just our population growth and technology growth that makes us more aware of these natural events.
We have always had the ability to listen to nature, but our complexity of abstractions and society monopolize our time. Another way of saying it is that there is a barrier between our non-consciousness or bicameral mind state and our consciousness. It is in what we believe that acts as a filter to protect our free will in what we want to believe. A filter that only lets through what is acceptable to our individual beliefs. And perhaps this filter is a two way com link.
I am one person who knows and with some hard lessons, that my thoughts can convert/manifest into reality. As such I have a goal to better control what thoughts convert, by improving my understanding in the since of doing or not..
There is my blog here which I started the beginning of this year in effort to try and get control over this ability. But there is also other work of mine in the unavoidable action constants of abstraction creation and use. http://abstractionphysics.
We were able to do some complex things but still limited. But our population grew and the complexity of society grew more than we were able to handle in such a non-conscious manner, so the bicameral mind of ours broke down, as recorded in the metaphor story of the tower of babel. We had to evolve to survive the growing population and complexity or society. We created consciousness, the ability to think in higher levels of abstraction, to overcome the problems.
However, it was recognized we had to give up our non-conscious tie into nature. So to help over come this loss the position of oracle was established. The job was to go into a trance like state, or revert back to a bicameral mind state to report back what nature was saying. In time this position of oracle became outdated as we developed our abstract knowledge to better deal with our environment. Yet today, we still have some who do such a thing, i.e. Edgar Cayce...
However, there is a bad side to the use of higher level abstractions, which required introspection. Deception was discovered in the use of higher level abstraction and even the first recorded suicide.
You can read up on all this by studying the works of Julian Jaynes. However, Julian's work is from a subjective POV in that its about what people experience incoming, not in what they were outputting back into the media of which nature used to communicate to them. Perhaps it didn't make enough difference then to be noticed as the knowledge was still very nature oriented even with the higher level abstractions then in use.
Today we have evolved our abstractions quite beyond nature, enough so that when the need arises again for us to take an evolutionary step, we will (and have begun to) notice how our thoughts can manifest into reality in more direct ways than through our hands on creation process.
We are not taking a step backwards, but rather we are beginning to incorporate the benefits of our non-conscious mind with our conscious mind via reintegrating our bicameral mind state. And again its due growing population and complexity of society that is driving it. But there is more which can push us to make the move sooner. Thenatural disaster of solar storms that knock out our electronics, including communication and perhaps even transportation (most vehicles today have an on board computer that will prevent the car from operating if its busted). And natural disasters may very well include the sort of events that seem to be building, flooding, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc. Or perhaps its just our population growth and technology growth that makes us more aware of these natural events.
We have always had the ability to listen to nature, but our complexity of abstractions and society monopolize our time. Another way of saying it is that there is a barrier between our non-consciousness or bicameral mind state and our consciousness. It is in what we believe that acts as a filter to protect our free will in what we want to believe. A filter that only lets through what is acceptable to our individual beliefs. And perhaps this filter is a two way com link.
I am one person who knows and with some hard lessons, that my thoughts can convert/manifest into reality. As such I have a goal to better control what thoughts convert, by improving my understanding in the since of doing or not..
There is my blog here which I started the beginning of this year in effort to try and get control over this ability. But there is also other work of mine in the unavoidable action constants of abstraction creation and use. http://abstractionphysics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)